Defiler_of_INRI
Skirmisher
posted 02-18-05 12:52 PM
EDT (US)
2 / 14
The dscription of the community forum, say "Place to chat about anything not related to AoE 3." this is very much related to AoE III, since i consider it a bane of AoE III, i know i walking the thin line but still.
pheasanthunter
Skirmisher
posted 02-18-05 01:21 PM
EDT (US)
7 / 14
That game definatly doesn't fall under my classifaction of an RTS. It's more like a RTS-RPG-FPS hybrid. In my mind you can go for either quality, or for quanity. I see the Age games as going for quality in the true RTS style, while this games seems to be going more towards quanity. Although I must admit that it was clever of them to include FPS elements with an RTS game, it could maybe pull in some of those FPS players that would otherwise ignore most RTS games. All in all, I wasn't real impressed. The big battle scenes were cool, but that's not what I look for in a RTS game. I noticed the preview didin't say much about economy, leading me to believe it was relativly simple, with the game focusing more on large, graphical battles then any sort of economical strategy.
vikesrule1234
Skirmisher
posted 02-18-05 01:51 PM
EDT (US)
10 / 14
the screenshots for that game look amazing, (wat was it called again)
even better than rome total war, which was the greatest game ever made (besides AOK of course)