john360
Skirmisher
posted 09-18-05 00:34 AM
EDT (US)
1 / 13
its damage per second???
WTF!!!it should be damage per attack!thats just stupid...
Dio_the_lonely
Banned
posted 09-18-05 00:35 AM
EDT (US)
2 / 13
Errr, I had trouble reading that. What did you say?
gelheadhobo
Skirmisher
posted 09-18-05 00:43 AM
EDT (US)
6 / 13
It's not damage per second, you can clearly see it's damage per attack. After all the work for realism and great gameplay ES put in, do you really think they would have that?
schildpad
Skirmisher
posted 09-18-05 03:43 AM
EDT (US)
10 / 13
it IS damage per attack, it SHOULD be damage per second, that much better
sexypanda
Skirmisher
posted 09-18-05 03:51 AM
EDT (US)
11 / 13
It HAS to be calculated as damage per attack, i mean, an archer with a rate of fire of 1.5 and a musketteer with a rate of fire of 3, they wont do their specific damage-per-second against a settler because he has Resistance to ranged attacks! So a longbowmen will face the settler resistance twice as much as the musketteer, but damage per second dont take that into account! I find this just stupid, it IS damage per attack but people want to get back to DPS??
DawnofChaos
Skirmisher
posted 09-18-05 04:27 AM
EDT (US)
12 / 13
In the thred i mentioned it was being expressed as damage per second.