Hey guys. I was thinking about decks, and was wondering... what if you were allowed to not have to choose between two decks until you use a card that only one of them had? For example: if I had two decks, and they both had the age1 3villie card, and I used it, I wouldn't have to choose between my decks yet, because that card was in both. Do you think this is a good idea, or does it give an unfair advantage? I'm leaning torwards 'unfair advantage', but what do y'all think?
He's saying that he wants to be able to have multiple decks with the same early cards, and then not have to choose between them until he wants to pick a card that isn't common among the decks.
|Ca_aok|HG Seraph wannabe| |{ca_aok@hotmail.com}| |{ESO2: [EEX] ca_aok}| O-- Member of EEX, and former member of LKS --O In the Darkness, there is Light, in the Old, there is New. From the Void a New Star rises, Shining down for Me and You.
That would be dumb. It would simply allow you to send infinite amounts of cards by spamming decks. Besides, in a long game you only receive about 20 shipments, so it's not a big deal anyways.
"I found no one ripe for many of my thoughts; the case of 'Zarathustra' proves that one can speak with the utmost clearness, and yet not be heard by any one." - Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche "The fearless are merely fearless. People who act in spite of their fear are truly brave." Oprichniks are the best units in AoE3. Why? It's elementary, they're Horse-riding Russian Pirates, nothing beats Horse-riding Russian Pirates.
Culverin Skirmisher
(id: Robert_Squared)
posted 01-12-06 10:44 PM
EDT (US)
5 / 6
No, no, no, no, no.... The card you used would be used in ALL the decks. You simply wouldn't have to choose which deck to use yet because both decks had it.