Yoda
Banned
posted 12-05-07 05:36 PM
EDT (US)
5 / 18
Trust a review from PC Gamer, I would not. Gave EEII a 90%, they did. Still, alot better than Warchiefs, TAD is, and to the series I welcome this addition! Clearly, to make games BHG knows how! Yes, hmmm.
The Crazy Idiot
Skirmisher
posted 12-05-07 11:25 PM
EDT (US)
8 / 18
I guess the grade is relative. compared to the original Age3, it may be decent. But compared to many stand-alone expansions released recently, it may seem a bit lacking in new features.
Eicho
Skirmisher
posted 12-06-07 00:15 AM
EDT (US)
10 / 18
I agree with Cyclo, there has to be no 'luck' based things on RTS games.
Tungsten_Knight
Skirmisher
posted 12-06-07 01:46 AM
EDT (US)
13 / 18
Matthew was a tax collector. And John, believe it or not, was the beloved disciple.
cheese68
Skirmisher
posted 12-06-07 08:58 AM
EDT (US)
16 / 18
Reviews of most things can't be trusted, it's not just games.
It doesn't matter what it is people will 'back-hand' money to ensure their product sells well.
It's even right down to selling the thing in the shop. Isn't commission on sales just a variant of the advertising money described above. If you're a sales person and product X pays you £30 and product Y pays you £50 then by default Y becomes better than X. It's the same all the way down the line.
Don't trust anyone else's opinion. Trying it for yourself is the only way to know. If you can't tell any difference then who cares.