Sorry. I was just curious.

Well curiosity banned the forummer.

Won't happen again, I promise.

Well that's your final unnofficial warning. One more and you end up with a topic in MA.

Ah, so that's where I should have looked... Sorry once more; I'll be good from now on!

WHat's the topic?

Beany baby suffrage. I say the place for beany babies is in the home!

Quote:

Oh, for the love of... there isn't. God, there's always one.

Always one topic?

Something like that.

Taylor MSN fast.

Anything for you Echo!

Someone on MSN, unsolicited, sent my girlfriend this:

你的一笑，使我 515;跳，你的一看， 世界震撼，你的 968;站，交通瘫痪， 你不打扮，已很 看，你一打扮， 431;宙惊叹，美女， 祝你 . 节快乐 祝美女你三围魔' 740;化 ，收入白领化 ，家务甩手化， 555;乐日常化 ，爱情持久化 ，情调小资化 ，购物疯狂化， 773;人规模化 ，老公奴隶化， 312;三八节即将来临 之际，代表党中 830;、国务院、中央 军委，向长期战 007;在试衣间、看韩 剧、不做饭、逛 823;街、魅力十足并 掌控老公钱包的 480;出女同胞致以节 日的问候， 你们辛苦了

Which apparently translates to:

You smile at me, my heart beats so that you can see that the world shook, your one-stop traffic is paralyzed, and you do not dress, has shown that one out, Cosmos astounding beauty, I wish you. Festival beauty you wish a happy story of the devil, the income of white-collar workers, domestic threw off his hand, daily happy, lasting love, the mood and feeling Inside, frenzied shopping, Valentine scale husband slaves, In March 8th Day of the 21st century on behalf of the CPC Central Committee, State Council and the Central Military Commission, in the long-term fight to the fitting room to see Korea Plays. not cooking Guangdajie charisma husband wallet full control of the outstanding female compatriots and extend festive greetings, you have worked hard.

It's so totally mainland China due to simplified Chinese.

So in other news I'm so totally hung over on a thursday. Yay for mid-week drinking.

I'm a sad man.

Taylor msn now!

Aight. The original sentence was "The cat sat on the mat". The objective? To expand it as much as possible while retaining the original meaning. The result?

We are now in a position to say in conclusion, and in light of the flatulent facts expostulated by my learned friends opposite, I suppose it would indeed seem, to all reasonable intents and/or purposes with which we're concerned as of this particular moment in time, presuming the existence of a physical universe containing at the very least cats, mats, afternoons, and sitting, a proverbial universe of proverbial matter, and if one is to follow traditional lines of thought in our society - though is it worth noting that one need not necessarily constrain oneself in such a way - that the alleged proverbial cat (ie: Felis domesticus), which may or may not in fact be a stoat (Mustella erminea) in disguise (according to a rather dubious yet not immediately discreditable source - ie., wikipedia or its right-of-centre alternative Conservapedia), contrary to popular belief as it is usually interpreted by the significant (but considered mostly disreputable by the minority) majority of humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) who are aware of stoat characteristics, almost certainly sat, lay, reclined or otherwise rested in a feline (if not, stoatlike) manner on the alleged proverbial fair-trade woven hemp mat (or indeed rug or other form of small-sized fabric floor covering made from fair-trade establishments in Colombia and neighbouring countries), which was, I think we can all agree, assuming that our perspectives, given cultural differences such as those in Commonwealth and American English, are more or less alike no doubt partly due to modern communication systems which render memetic isolation impossible, most likely placed by the hand of some unknown actor resting on the floor (given the normal orientation of the floor with respect to the immutable laws of gravity), which appeared to be a relatively flat surface (as floors are wont to be) or moach, thoroughly enjoying, though it is a matter of conjecture whether either cats or stoats are capable of the basic human emotion of 'enjoyment' (in which case it is fair to assume artistic licence for this particular scenario despite the utter illogical nature of such an assumption in the eyes of autistics and pedants), what is generally referred to as the alleged proverbial afternoon - that is to say - and it is important to maintain absolute clarity in such matters - a time (presuming as I believe for the sake of sanity we must that this event is occuring in a universe with linear time) commonly denoting the time between noon and night, or otherwise evening - from the apparent location, or in French "lieu" (or the Peul "laban') of the aforementioned alleged proverbial mat (or rug) of woven hemp (viz. the one which was on the floor - though some would call into question the accuracy of this), with no alleged or imagined disturbances (neither those disturbances that a cat/stoat would mind, nor the social disturbances that tend to befall derelict governments), applying, so to speak, an anthropomorphic personality to the aforementioned animal (be it either cat or stoat) which may or may not be true seeing as determining the true state of mind of such an animal (cat or stoat) is purely a matter for conjecture, although some (chiefly the cat/stoat lobby and esteemed holy men of the Brahman caste such as Sadhus) would debate this for personal motives, and on the grounds that the study of animal behaviour is quite well advanced.

Esau Wood sawed wood. Esau Wood would saw wood. All the wood Esau Wood saw, Esau Wood would saw. In other words, all the wood Esau saw to saw, Esau sought to saw. Oh, the wood Wood would saw! And, oh the wood-saw with which Wood would saw wood! But one day, Wood's wood-saw would saw no wood, and thus the wood Wood sawed was not the wood Wood would saw if Wood's wood-saw would saw wood. Now, Wood would saw wood with a wood-saw that would saw wood, so Esau sought a saw that would saw wood. One day, Esau saw a saw saw wood as no other wood-saw Wood saw would saw wood. In fact, of all the wood-saws Wood ever saw saw wood, Wood never saw a wood-saw that would saw wood as the wood-saw Wood saw saw wood would saw wood, and I never saw a wood-saw that would saw as the wood-saw Wood saw would saw until I saw Esau Wood saw wood with the wood-saw Wood saw saw wood. Now Wood saws wood with the wood-saw Wood saw saw wood.

wut

He SAID Esau Wood sawed wood. Esau Wood would saw wood. All the wood Esau Wood saw, Esau Wood would saw. In other words, all the wood Esau saw to saw, Esau sought to saw. Oh, the wood Wood would saw! And, oh the wood-saw with which Wood would saw wood! But one day, Wood's wood-saw would saw no wood, and thus the wood Wood sawed was not the wood Wood would saw if Wood's wood-saw would saw wood. Now, Wood would saw wood with a wood-saw that would saw wood, so Esau sought a saw that would saw wood. One day, Esau saw a saw saw wood as no other wood-saw Wood saw would saw wood. In fact, of all the wood-saws Wood ever saw saw wood, Wood never saw a wood-saw that would saw wood as the wood-saw Wood saw saw wood would saw wood, and I never saw a wood-saw that would saw as the wood-saw Wood saw would saw until I saw Esau Wood saw wood with the wood-saw Wood saw saw wood. Now Wood saws wood with the wood-saw Wood saw saw wood.

That thread made me cry

Okay, but we seems to be doing it anyway, so im going to go to OD, steal the thread an post it here. Yays.

How much ground could a groundhog hog if a groundhog could hog ground?

15 square miles.

Open slot in Mission Risk.

There's my skinny little face all the way on the left.

lol...no comment.