Their was the reason y both side didn't had artilery as both had cavalry plus both had anti artilery stuff as both had india :) but later it was like we did some mistakes and we were down at early stage were at a point dominating but failed as his urmies came :D
Posted on 06/08/12 @ 10:23 AM
I agree that both sides had lots of cav but if you watch the big battles, the back-center of each army never was attacked by a flank or attack which circumvented the main battle. Had any side placed just a few falconets there the battle would have looked much different.
If they had the fight would have been much more one-sided.
If you had you could have won imho.
It's all about positioning the artillery, but of course Iam captain hindsight right now :)
Posted on 06/08/12 @ 10:25 AM
What I wanted to add: It's not about the artillery surviving the fight and totally destroying everything, it is about the artillery killing more than it costed. Which can be achieved in just two salves if focused correctly, or three salves if on auto attack against most infantry.
INDEFATIGABLE01 File Author
Posted on 06/09/12 @ 01:30 PM
May be you are right would have been the case :) would rather go for falconet from partner player or atleast a siege elephants to counter them.