Author |
File Description |
omarin |
Posted on 03/22/06 @ 09:17 PM
During a Yanki Campaing in the west of the United States of America the weather was extremly cold and the Yanki army as well as the Native Cherokees had to hunt animals to survive... but things dont allways end the way we think...
Just wanted to try some diferent ideas, hope you enjoy.
by omarin |
Pages: « First « 1 [2] |
Author | Comments & Reviews ( All | Comments Only | Reviews Only ) |
---|
omarin
File Author |
Posted on 03/25/06 @ 01:42 PM
Go ahead and shoot some questions.
I learned the hard way thow, opening in the editor scenarios from other people that i consider are well executed and studing them.
another really good tutor was: age of wiki |
SharpShooter99 |
Posted on 03/25/06 @ 02:38 PM
Thats what i do, but i mainly learned from Starcraft, AoE 3 is weird and different. But some thing are similar to Starcraft's triggers. |
heathenmedusa |
Posted on 03/30/06 @ 03:31 PM
Mental |
ScaryLarry |
Posted on 04/08/06 @ 09:17 AM
Playability: 1
I hate to be a 'wet blanket' but this seems to be mostly a waste of creative energy and time. While it might be 'playable' a more important question would be, "Why play it?" What is, I suppose, meant to be some sort of 'ecological' message turns out to be no more than a bloodbath on both sides... What's the message of that??
Balance: 1
Wolves and bears and bison against cannon and organ guns?? ...not much balance there, is there??
Creativity: 3
Creative in the sense that it hasn't been on here before. 8-)
Map Design: 2
Looks pretty nice but is a lot like the one with the millions of Indians
Story/Instructions: 2
Again... OK but you need a spellchecker!!
Additional Comments:
I believe the Bill of Rights calls for the "...Right to bear arms." Not the "...Right to arm bears."
[Edited on 04/11/06 @ 03:07 AM]
|
omarin
File Author |
Posted on 04/10/06 @ 12:32 PM
dude you need a spellchecker also!
as you say... go by the review guidelines, spellcheck before posting.
Quote:
I hate to be a 'wet blanket' but this seems to be mostly an waste of creative energy and time. While it might be 'platable' a more important question would be, "Why play it?" What is, I suppose, meant to be some sort of 'ecological' message turns out to be no more than a bloodbath on both sides... What's the message of that??
It is very easy for you to go a head and criticize other peoples work and rate with a 2.0 I see you havent uploaded no scenario so that makes me belive 2 things:
1-you dont know nothing about the editor
2-your just in a comfortable position making fun about other peoples work.
dont really want to argue with you (would be a wast of time) just want to ask you to stop reviewing my scenarios and if you really consider them boring as you pointed out in one of your reviews (why play them?)
well... dont do it. dont even download them dont wast your time. |
SharpShooter99 |
Posted on 04/10/06 @ 08:31 PM
I hate ppl who criticize, they're heartless cuz they think they're more "Superior" than others and dont even care about the message even tho its seen all over the world. Those ppl belong in government. Not in technology research which can improve life.[Edited on 04/10/06 @ 09:47 PM]
|
Kogen |
Posted on 04/10/06 @ 09:07 PM
Playability: 1
The map is barely playable at all, all it is is random units placed everywhere that don't even function right. Most of these units are useless or extremely weak.
Balance: 1
Due to the awful way the units were placed and set, I consider the balance to be terrible. A bunch of bears in a gaint pile getting gunned down and moose everywhere getting in your way isn't really that good.
Creativity: 3
I have to admit, it is a rather unusual idea for a this map, but the only part worth even looking at is the opening movie which is fairly well made, excluding the dreadful dialogue. Being able to spell correctly and have your sentences make sense helps a lot.
Map Design: 4
You did put some work into the map itself, so I'll have to give you a 4 for this. Due to some things making places a little too hard to advance through(trees, terrian), it isn't perfect for this game-type you've chosen.
Story/Instructions: 4
The opening movie looks really great, just improve your English skills and it'll surely be a lot better next time.
Additional Comments:
I was very much so expecting a better game type then just mass units, perhaps you can try this again and put more work into it. Your idea does have potential, and you can make movies good.[Edited on 04/11/06 @ 05:36 PM]
|
SharpShooter99 |
Posted on 04/10/06 @ 09:47 PM
can u rate my my Operation Overlord:D-Day(Omaha) scenario? I need more feedback for my sequel scenario. |
ScaryLarry |
Posted on 04/11/06 @ 03:12 AM
Omarin-
Please be an adult and don't "cry" because someone critiques your work in a manner you don't like. Also, if you are going to "quote" what I have written, at least do so correctly.
You truly have no idea how many maps I have on here. 8-)!!! |
mrrags1 |
Posted on 05/11/06 @ 09:31 AM
Playability: 1
Not very playable in the true sense of the word. It seems to mosty be just a bunch of animals thrown helter-skelter around the map with some human units marching through the middle of it. I could never see paying this more than once. I'm surprised I stayed with it as long as I did.
Balance: 1
So what is the balance of animals against guns and cannons?
Creativity: 3
Pretty average. Other than throwing defensless animals up against weapons, I didn't really see anything extraordinary, new or different.
Map Design: 3
Again, pretty average. Almost looks like a random generated map.
Story/Instructions: 2
All right I guess but you really need some help with your English skills. You're good at calling people "dude" but that's the wrong way to go for improvement. Not everyone is a "dude", dude.
Additional Comments:
|
Pages: « First « 1 [2] |